Vija Celmins is my favourite artist right now, her exhibit at the Artist Rooms has made me go back twice already and there’s another trip planned for monday. Really think she is brilliant, so I’m writing my philosophy essay on her work. We have to choose two philosophical aesthetics theories and interpret them to the work. For the first one I am going to choose the sublime as I truly believe that is a huge element to her work.
Celmins was born in 1938 in Latvia and was brought up there and Germany until the age of ten when she moved to America. This is quite relevant to some of her work as some works include images tha remind her of her wartime childhood ie planes and blimps etc. She works mainly in charcoal, graphite and painting but also experiments with printing techniques in some of her more major works. The works themselves are usually images of the sea, space, deserts and spiderwebs, however she did dabble in hyperrealism for a while.
Like her earlier stuff Celmins more recent work questions the idea of representation. Are the drawings she has made perfect? Or are any drawings perfect? It is impossible to create an exact likeness to the real thing. However I believe that Celmins has chosen to represent the works this way due to her interest in recreating the 3-Dimensional on a flat surface.
Her Spiderweb drawings are incredibly interesting too

What really hit me whilst in the exhibit was the question one young girl asked her mum “Where is the spider?” And indeed I never questioned it myself. In relation to her other works I believe it can be read as to questioning who is the creator? Is there a creator? There is also lack of a character in the drawing for the viewer to relate to. This may allude to the fact her pieces are snapshots of life seen through microscopes, telescopes or even cameras. These points are all very significant to her universe and nightsky drawings.

Her space drawings are my favourite ones as they remind me of my own work and appeal to my love of sci-fi.

so yeah, thought I’d slip some of my own artworks in there haha. One of her other works is the ocean woodcuts and drawings. I believ these reference the sublime, but in a sort of working way, the artist has realised the sublime through really technically difficult and intricate work.

n the conceIntric bearings pieces, the artist alludes to her history and also to the theme of rotation which is prominent in some of her other works. In Concentric Bearings D Celmins combines pictures of her own nightsky work, Marcel Duchamp’s Rotary Glass Plates(an optical illusion piece) and a picture of a plane which reminds her of her childhood. 
In another piece with multiple images, Jupiter Moon – constellation, Celmins explores a minute detail in a mass of stars, a kind of metaphor for herself and the rest of space. She is so small but so individual, so it is again like another sublime idea. In Constellation – Uccello, 1983, I think Celmins point of view is most obvious. It is a multiple print piece, one of a nightsky depicting a starscape exploring the 3D in a two dimensional surface, really getting into the rendering idea, whilst on the right is a tracing of a drawing of Uccello’s chalice. It was likely the work was traced from a book whilst Celmins was studying in Florence. The drawing of the chalice represents another idea of 3D being shown on a 2-Dimensional plane, but is a more graphical approach. The two pieces are linked this way.
Read Full Post »